Podcast Episode 128: Farewell Episode
In this final and farewell episode of the podcast, we reflect on the many guests and therefore perspectives that we have had on the show, and the important...
Podcast Episode 127: Robert Thomas on Eminent Domain Cases to Watch and the 2024 ALI-CLE Eminent Domain and Land Valuation Litigation Conference
Robert Thomas of Pacific Legal Foundation joins us for a review of three impactful cases that eminent domain practitioners should watch as they work their way through the...
Podcast Episode 126: Brandi Kellam and Louis Hansen on the Displacement of the Shoe Lane Community
Investigative journalists Brandi Kellam and Louis Hansen have uncovered the story of the Shoe Lane community in Newport News, Virginia, a middle-class black neighborhood that has been largely...
Podcast Episode 125: Professor Shelley Ross Saxer on Inverse Condemnation Claims in Hawaii Wildfire Litigation
Professor Shelley Ross Saxer joins the show to discuss the role that the damaging clauses found in more than half of state constitutions across the United States play...
Podcast Episode 124: Stephen Clarke on Important Considerations in Settlement Agreements
The overwhelming majority of eminent domain cases settle, and Stephen Clarke of the Waldo & Lyle law firm in Virginia joins the show today to share insights on...
Podcast Episode 123: Matthew Ackerman on Subjective Losses in Takings
Matthew Ackerman of the Ackerman & Ackerman law firm in Michigan joins the show to discuss what he has called “the pitfalls of objectively measured just compensation” –...
Podcast Episode 5 – Shane Rayman Discusses Expropriation Law in Canada and Jeff Mead Discusses Municipal Tree Ordinances
Shane Rayman We go international in Episode 5 with Shane Rayman of Rayman Beitchman LLP in Toronto, Ontario....
Locke Lord QuickStudy: Tree-Preservation Ordinances in Texas Municipalities May Constitute Regulatory Takings
Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton issued an opinion on July 14, 2017 concluding that municipal tree-preservation ordinances in Texas may, in certain...
Podcast Episode 4 – Interview with Professor Ilya Somin to discuss Murr v. Wisconsin, and a Discussion of Sabal Trail case from Florida
Ilya Somin In Episode 4, we are joined by Professor Ilya Somin of the George Mason School of...
Locke Lord QuickStudy: SCOTUS Establishes a New Three-Part Test To Determine the “Whole Parcel” in Regulatory Takings Cases
Property owners who allege a regulatory taking will now need to analyze their holdings against a new, fact-specific, three-factor standard announced by...
Podcast Episode 3 – Murr v. Wisconsin and Emerging Issues in Eminent Domain Appraisals with Lance Coyle, MAI
Lance Coyle, MAI In Episode 3, Jeff Mead discusses the U.S. Supreme Court's recent decision in Murr v....
Murr v. Wisconsin Ruling
[et_pb_section bb_built="1" admin_label="section"][et_pb_row admin_label="row"][et_pb_column type="4_4"][et_pb_text admin_label="Text"] The Supreme Court today ruled against the Murrs, who owned a waterfront lot in Wisconsin, and...
CLINT SCHUMACHER, PODCAST HOST
Clint has represented property owners of all sizes that are being impacted by public projects. Over the last twenty years, Clint has developed a particular expertise in condemnation for highway projects. LEARN MORE >>>
POPULAR EPISODES
SUBSCRIBE TO BE NOTIFIED WHEN A NEW SHOW IS RELEASED.
Something went wrong. Please check your entries and try again.
Copyright © Dawson & Sodd, PLLC. 2024 Attorney Advertising - Website made by Marketing Access Pass